Defending against the various ways donors cheat to pass a drug test is an ongoing battle. Organizations that conduct drug testing must be aware of the many ways samples can be tampered with, and at times the solution to halt this persistent problem can seem like a constantly moving target.
With a quick internet search, people can access thousands of websites that focus on the many ways drug users can pass their upcoming drug test. These resources offer everything from free targeted advice on the best ways to beat certain types of tests, sell products, additives, and even synthetic urine. Many drug abusers have become highly competent and continue to come up with new ways to beat a drug test, especially when the stakes are high. Knowing what the cheaters know and evolving your programs testing protocol is critical.
The dilution method requires the user to consume large amounts of liquid (water, juice, etc.) leading up to the drug test, with the goal to dilute the drug concentration. Although a diluted urine sample does not automatically mean the individual is a drug user, the specimen will usually be reported by a laboratory as an unfit sample for testing.
The substitution method is self-explanatory in that it is just the substitution of one person’s urine with that of someone (or something) else’s. This method can pose complications for the cheater, however it may cause the urine to be visually dirty or the container used to store the substituted urine might break or leak. To avoid these complications, products and advice is readily available online.
This method is carried out by the person hiding a container of concealed urine to dump out into a sample cup. This method requires the donor to keep the sample warm within an acceptable temperature range, while also pouring the urine out quietly without the collector knowing. People looking to pass their test may use condoms or other more advanced container styles with flexible tubes to hide the container and dispense the urine even under supervision. Even more extreme scenarios have been taken by cheaters emptying their bladders and having substituted urine injected directly into their bladders via a needle.
With the adulteration or additive method, the user adds something to the urine, typically after they have personally voided their own specimen. Common additives include bleach, vinegar, eye drops, dish soap, and even drain cleaners. There are also a variety of products that claim to interfere with the testing process/results.
Although people continue to attempt new and creative ways to beat a test, there are many things employers, treatment facilities and criminal justice organizations can do to minimize, if not eliminate, the cheaters’ chances of success. With advancements in science, more and more testing programs are moving to oral fluid testing to overcome the problems associated with people cheating their test.
Oral fluid drug testing makes for a valuable addition to the testing methods organizations can use. Oral fluid testing is 100% observed and offers an ideal solution that is less invasive than other methods of testing. Direct observation during collection allows testing to be administered anytime and anywhere, drastically reducing the opportunity for tampering and use of adulteration products. Because of these benefits, oral fluid testing is considered a tamper-resistant screening method and almost impossible to cheat.
Premier Biotech’s OralTox is a rapid oral fluid testing product with the ability to test for up to 12 drugs simultaneously. OralTox was designed with our customers in mind. Our goal was to deliver a product that would deliver fast, accurate, clear results while eliminating the risk of adulteration by substitution, dilution, or additives. Based on our customer feedback, we have successfully accomplished that.